Abstract
A study of its ranking properties finds the Morningstar risk-adjusted ratings (RAR) for the decade ending 2001 and the excess return from a CAPM regression yield similar star ratings, but there are systematic differences between the RAR star ratings and the excess return estimated according to the Fama-French three-factor model. Over three-quarters of domestic equity funds with a ten-year five-star Morningstar rating do not keep their five stars under the null hypothesis of the Fama-French model. An explanation of this discrepancy provides support for the extensive modification of the Morningstar rating system made in July 2002.
- © 2005 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600
Log in using your username and password
In this issue
Jump to section
Similar Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.